December 14, 2016

    I recently chatted with a colleague representing a young boy with a chronic digestive disorder. The principal of his public school refused to allow him to snack during the day as his doctor required, and the child’s condition seriously deteriorated as a result. My friend brought a personal injury action on the boy’s behalf against the school board and the principal.

    The case would have been much stronger if my friend had included a civil rights cause of action in her complaint. The child had a protected liberty interest in eating whatever and whenever his health required, and asserting this right as a due process claim would have yielded many benefits. To name just two, the child would have been eligible to recover punitive damages from the principal and attorney’s fees from both the principal and the school board. The defendants’ potential liability and eagerness to settle the case would have been correspondingly higher.

    Unfortunately, we as lawyers tend to be unaware of the gaps in our own knowledge. The lesson from this case is that anytime one is litigating against the government, it is imperative to ascertain whether a potential civil rights claim lurks beneath the surface and what advantages asserting it may provide.




Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

February 20, 2019

November 10, 2016

October 22, 2016

Please reload


2 Venture, Suite 450
Irvine, California 92618


Law Office of

Stuart Miller


All website content copyright © 2019 Stuart Miller 

The content of this website is provided for informational purposes only and should not be

construed as legal advice or as creating an attorney-client relationship.